|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
According to DigiTimes, shipments by chipmakers of DDR2 DRAM to PC OEMs are still low because the yield rates at 0.11-micron process technology are still too low to provide a consistent chip supply. With high reject rates, the DDR2 remains clearly more expensive than the DDR. However as DDR2 currently doesn’t provide important performances gains compared to the DDR, this price issue isn’t really such a big deal… |
 | |
 |
Early November we announced that memory prices have been reduced after a 16.7% increase from mid-September to early October. This price reduction continues in November, 32 MB DDR400 chip prices have been reduced by 10.3% from $4.48 in the beginning of November to $4.02 today. We are back to the lowest price ever recorded for this type of chip: it was one year ago in November. |
 | |
 |
According to our colleagues from DigiTimes, OEM price of 4x DVD+/-R discs for OEMs have been reduced to US$0.15, instead of US$0.30 during the first semester.
The new price, initiated by Chinese manufacturers, is now lower than current average production costs of US$0.16-0.17 in Taiwan. Taiwanese and Japanese manufacturers have now shifted their production focus to 8x and 16x DVD+R/-R discs. The market price for 8x and 16x DVD+R/-R discs has however also been reduced from 0.8 to 1$ in the beginning of the third quarter to 0.4-0.5$ today.
|
 | |
 |
Intel has discreetly released a new Pentium M, the 710. This processor has a 90 nm fabrication process and is equipped with 2 MB of cache like all Pentium M based on the Dothan core. The 710 is clocked at 1.4 GHz and hasn’t been officially announced yet. What is the difference between this processor and the Celeron M 360 1.4 GHz? Except for the cache L2, 2 Mb instead of 1MB, these processors are identical and even performances are similar in practice.
But with this product, laptop manufactures are able to offer an even cheaper Pentium M. The Celeron M has a disadvantage because of its name even if the performance gap between the Pentium M and the Celeron M is not equivalent to the performance gap between the desktop Pentium 4 and Celeron. |
 | |
|
|
Copyright © 1997- Hardware.fr SARL. All rights reserved.
Read our privacy guidelines.
|
|