|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
One of the brand selling ATI's products gave us more information regarding the release of R600, or X2900, if we use the commercial name.
According to the documents that we saw, the evaluation samples of the Catseye 102-B600 delivered to ATI's clients and corresponding to the X2900 XT with 512 MB of GDDR3 memory, are scheduled to be released in March 22 (even if ATI has already sent demonstration computers to each manufacturer to show them to their own clients).
As usual now for high end models, ATI will deliver cards produced by subcontractors and the first deliveries of the final product are scheduled for the 21rst of April. The availability for end users will be at the same time as the product release, early May, the time for manufacturers to stick their logos, put the cards in boxes, and ship them.
The same document speaks of the Dragonshead 2 102-B007, or X2900 XTX, featuring 1 GB of DDR4 memory. Release dates are similar to the samples, 22nd of March, but the final products are expected May 1rst and mass availability mid-May. However, as another manufacturer told us that this card might not even be released, we don’t know really who is right and who isn't! |
 | |
 |
If some motherboard manufacturers such as ASUSTeK and Gigabyte told us that they couldn't give us any information regarding the possibility of using future Intel 45nm dual core and quad core processors (the Wolfdale and Yorkfield) with current motherboards, other sources told us that it wouldn't be possible.
Officially, only the chipsets of the Bearlake series, including the P35 and G33 to be released in June, will be compatible and it is likely that this will also be the case of older chipsets if motherboards based on these chipsets are modified. Of course, we will have to verify this info in practice when manufacturers will have samples available.
Intel will officially release processors using 45 nm process early 2008, but we are expecting the first quad core extreme edition samples at the end of 2007. |
 | |
 |
Those who were expecting demonstrations of AMD quad core processors at CeBIT must have been quite pleased to see that not a single processor was in sight. Nevertheless, AMD spoke of the release of quad core processors: the Barcelona for servers scheduled to be released mid-2007 and the Agena for desktop which will be available in September.
We were unable, however, to find other information than the official ones and the processor frequencies, 2.1 to 2.3 GHz for the Barcelona and 2.4 to 2.6 GHz for the Agena, haven't been confirmed. Also, if no specific indications were given about the desktop performances, AMD speaks, of course, of higher performances than Intel's products.
 The good news is the compatibility of AM2+ quad core processors with current AM2 motherboards. Indeed, according to AMD but also a well known motherboard manufacturer, this compatibility will be effective. A motherboard with an AM2 socket will be compatible with AM2 and AM2+ CPU and vice versa. Also, according to the same manufacturer, future AM3 processors using 45nm fabrication process and compatible with DDR2 and DDR3 will be compatible with current motherboards. AM2 and AM2+ processors will not, however, be compatible with AM3 motherboards as the latter is restricted to DDR3. Of course, with AM2 sockets, future AM2+ quad core processors will not express their full potential: they will not work with HyperTransport 3.0 but with 1.0, and the distinct voltage between the cores and the memory controller will not be possible. There is one question left: under those circumstances why AMD doesn't communicate more on the upgrade possibilities? |
 | |
 |
We have obtained some information on performances of middle line and entry level GeForce 8: the GeForce 8600 GTS, 8600 GT and 8500 GT. These performances are restricted to 3DMark 06 and have to be put into perspective since the benchmark isn't always representative of performances in games.
With the same platform, if an 8800 GTX would obtain 11900 points, a GeForce 8600 GTS would obtain 7000 points or an identical score to the Radeon X1950 XTX. The GeForce 8600 GT with 5800 points would be slightly faster than the Radeon X1950 Pro and GeForce 7950 GT whereas the GeForce 8500 GT (2800 points) would be a little less performing than the Radeon X1650 Pro.
We noted that, for once, Nvidia has given a higher number to the entry level (based on G86). The card name is GeForce 8500 and not "GeForce 8200". Let's hope that this new approach isn't made to rename old products in GeForce 8xxx or have more entry level products and even less performing GeForce 8… |
 | |
|
|
Copyright © 1997- Hardware.fr SARL. All rights reserved.
Read our privacy guidelines.
|
|