|
 |
|
 |
After a difficult start, AMD is trying to give a boost to the Phenom with a new revision, tri-core models and lower prices. How do they fare in tests? |
 |
With the E7200 and Q9300, Intel offers more affordable 45nm Core 2 dual and quad cores. Do these processors live up to promises in terms of power consumption, performance, and overclocking? |
 |
 |
With the 9850, we have a new revision of the Phenom which is supposed to enable AMD’s quad-core to rival that of Intel’s. Let’s see how it fares with this first attempt. |
 |
After a few long months, K10 architecture finally comes to the desktop with the Phenom. A year after the release of the Core 2 Quad, does AMD have a processor capable of contending? |
|
 |
While we are still waiting for a response to the Core 2 from AMD, Intel launches the Penryn, a 45 nm evolution of its Core architecture. The QX9650 will be the first available commercialized version. |
 |
In December, the Phenom will succeed the Athlon 64. In the meantime, we invite you to take a look at K10 architecture which AMD first introduced with the Opteron. |
|
 |
Can Supreme Commander be used as a benchmark? What level of performance is required by the CPU, graphic card and memory to run the game? Which parameters increase performances? |
 |
An Athlon 64 X2 processor clocked at 3 GHz? This is what AMD proposes with the 6000+. With recent price cuts will it be enough to compete with the Core2? The answer is in this test… |
|
