|
|
 |
 |
 |
| Review index: |
|
|
Product review: 16 multi-function printers from 50 to 259 euros
by Vincent Alzieu
Published on May 19, 2007
Photo quality, enlarged X3 and X6 Like in the previous test, we added a reference, here, the Canon Pixma CP730, a small 10 x 15 cm thermal sublimation printer. This is an example of what can be obtained on a high quality photo printer with results similar to photo labs. Invisible dots, good sharpness and contrast, nice images can be produced at home. Some of the ink jets we tested here stood up well to the comparison, others did not.
Please note that the below extracts are enlarged X3 on the left, and X6 on the right. This isn’t what you really see, but what can be determined by a meticulous study of photos. Either way, the more drops are visible, the less pleasing the photo will be, while some models are capable of photo lab quality. Photo 1 original | Photo 2 original | Enlargement X3 | Enlargement X6 | Brother DCP-130C/330C/440CN/750CW | Brother DCP-130C/330C/440CN/750CW | Canon Pixma MP160 | Canon Pixma MP160 | Canon Pixma MP510 | Canon Pixma MP510 | Canon Pixma MP600 | Canon Pixma MP600 | Epson DX5050/DX6050 | Epson DX5050/DX6050 | Epson RX560 | Epson RX560 | Epson RX640 | Epson RX640 | HP C3180/C4180 | HP C3180/C4180 | HP C6180 | HP C6180 | HP : color + photo | HP : color + photo | Lexmark X2550/X3550 | Lexmark X2550/X3550 | Lexmark X9350 | Lexmark X9350 | Canon CP730 | Canon CP730 |
Our opinion Epson has for some time been the choice of professional photographers, and this page shows us why. The prints of the Stylus Photo RX560 and RX640 are closest to photo lab quality, with a nice brilliance on paper, true colors, and invisible drops. After this, there is the Canon MP600 and then HP’s C6180.
|
 |
Copyright © 1997- Hardware.fr SARL. All rights reserved.
Read our privacy guidelines.
|
|