Home  |  News  |  Reviews  | About Search :  HardWare.fr 



  Processors

  Motherboards

  Graphic Cards

  Multimedia

  Storage

  Imaging

  Monitors

  Miscellaneous
Advertise on BeHardware.com
Review index:
Screen comparative test : CRT vs LCD
by Vincent Alzieu
Published on August 24, 2004

Design, bulkiness
The FP767-12 is 15.9“ high and 14.9” wide and 7,5” thick.



Of course, the Mitsubishi screen is the bulkier (17.5” x17.60”x17.7”). This cubic shaped screen is three times bigger than the flat screen and generates a waist of space on your desk. For an optimum vision comfort, the distance between the user and the screen must be: 1.5 x the exact screen size diagonal.

The size of the monitors is approximately 17”, so the right distance is: 17 x 1.5 = 25.5 in.

25.5 + 7.5 (the BenQ thickness)= 33” from the back of the FP767-12 screen to the user. Any type of desk is wide enough to optimally use this screen.

25.5 + 17.7= 43.2” from the back of the Mitsubishi screen to the user. These time standard desks are not big enough for this screen.



It is not surprising but the LCD screen win the bulkiness award. However if your desk isn’t too close to a wall it is possible to put the back of your screen a little bit beyond the desk limit.

<< Previous page
The bill : buying + electric consumption

Page index
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
Next page >>
Installation, when a graphic card formats a screen  




Copyright © 1997- Hardware.fr SARL. All rights reserved.
Read our privacy guidelines.